Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: MNJohnnie

SOS! SOS!

Oh for Pete's sake....

please explain this to me.....

I am still not convinced one way or the other on this particular issue... BUT

the fact that Bush has been unwilling to VETO all the gross spending.... the BILL OF TERRORISTS (by McCain- spit) ..etc.. but he IS willing to VETO THIS.. well, I just think this HURTS us... how the heck do I swallow this well.....

I know you have the answer... please just fill me in!

LOL!


1,576 posted on 02/21/2006 5:15:50 PM PST by eeevil conservative (Islam is not under attack by the US........the US is under attack by ISLAM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1567 | View Replies ]


To: eeevil conservative
A threat of a veto is not a veto. I doubt he will veto this either. Wish he had actually vetoed the Highway bill like he threatened to LAST year. Just more of the war of words. This whole Port things is full of sound and fury signifying NOTHING. Funny how the foes of the Port Deal STILL cannot explain why it is FINE for this company to run operations and ship TO dozens of US ports millions of containers over the years. A Port Operations Company has ZERO security functions. There are NO American Companies who do this function so the "Buy American" propaganda by Chucky and the Insane Democrat Senate Posse is just nonsensical noise. The Port Shippers are the people the Coast Guard, the Border Patrol and the Customs Service are WATCHING. Much to do about a complete NOTHING
1,593 posted on 02/21/2006 5:24:28 PM PST by MNJohnnie ("Close the UN, Keep Gitmo!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1576 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson