Replies

A post (a classy one at that) indicating that Dimensio didn't realize the first post was a quote and apologizing for reacting to the post as if it were the poster's own words. Not a lie, just an apology for misunderstanding.

Not exactly. I am explaining the specific reason why I (and others) have called nmh a liar in the past, and offering nmh an opportunity to explain the situation to show that we may have misunderstood. I've not yet acknowledged any misunderstanding. Thus far it appears to me that nmh made a statement about Antony Flew and then later denied saying anything about the man. I am merely pointing out why this appears to be the case to me and asking nmh to be so kind as to explain how I may be mistaken.

1,323 posted on 02/21/2006 4:46:09 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)

Look I read those threads and the posts you put up.

He could very well be responding to the 'atheist' in the article (who is a he) without being aware of Flew as you are. nmh refers to 'he' not Flew.

This might be hard to grasp, but it is a very very tiny subset of humanity that would be in the groupie for atheist evo cultism sect.

Wolf

thanks -- and it is interesting they should use your posts to "prove" their point when it was so obvious it would be the opposite