Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: darbymcgill

If we're going with #1, then what statement was pnsn's assertion that any claim of dishonesty on his part was tantamount to calling God a liar attempting to support?


1,278 posted on 02/21/2006 3:21:18 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1273 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio; presently no screen name
If we're going with #1,

If I were to defend Bill Clinton by saying to you that he "did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinski"... would you agree that the statement was an assertion offered as evidence of truth?? we can agree to yes, I presume...

To which you reply that I was a liar...

And to which I respond... If you're calling me a liar then you're calling Bill Clinton a liar... again a statement of assertion as evidence of truth?? we can agree that he said what he said, can't we? presumed yes????

Do you infer from my statement that I am claiming to be Bill Clinton posting as dm..??? Of course not, and yes pnsn was using the statement to support his version of the truth.

This rhetorical conversation was in no way intended to imply any correlation between WJC and God...
1,297 posted on 02/21/2006 3:56:03 PM PST by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1278 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson