[Dimensio]

Ok then, from which part of the post did you logically infer that the poster was an arrogant, delusional liar?

This statement:

"Every time you call me a liar, you are calling God a liar"

There are no qualifiers here. Attempting to identify any deliberate falsehood uttered by pnsn is deemed a personal attack on God Himself. I can see only two possible implications from this statement: either pnsn is claiming to be God Himself, or that absolutely everything that pnsn states -- with no exceptions -- comes, unerringly, from God's mouth and that I am supposed to realise this already (otherwise I could not possibly knowingly be calling God a liar).

This has nothing to do with pnsn's belief in literal Biblical creationism. This is about a claim that any attempt at exposing a falsehood on pnsn's part, no matter what the subject or context, is tantamount to calling God a liar.

[darbymcgill]

This is about a claim that any attempt at exposing a falsehood on pnsn's part, no matter what the subject or context, is tantamount to calling God a liar.

So rather than politely point out the actual flaws in the statement as you have many times before. You seemed in this case to find it more appropriate to defeat his argument by making the potentially false assumption that he claims to be God, then calling him an arrogant, delusional liar.