Why do you think this way?
Hmmmm...not entirely sure, given your somewhat "drive-by posting" style, that you really are soliciting an answer--but what the heck, I'll bite.
I think this way (about 'sola scriptura' Protestantism) by definition; truth, under this tenant, is literally available by scripture alone.
In which case, it follows, one can have no meaningful traffic with science. And althought the account is now known to be apocraphyal, the 'logic' would seem to be that attributed to Caliph Omar, said (wrongly, as it happens) to have burned all the books from the magnificent library at Alexandria on the grounds that "they will either contradict the Koran, in which case they are heresy, or they will agree with it, so they are superfluous."
That, it seems to me, is the end-point of 'sola scriptura.'