To: Junior
That was not a logical lapse.
It appears that you guys have been passing around the logical fallacies for dummies book lately. Maybe DC should stock up on version II.
If it was not a logical fallacy then all one needs to do to defeat an opponent's argument is claim they are "arrogant, delusional liars" and they instantly win.
Makes sense to me....
To: darbymcgill
The original poster equated himself with God. Wouldn't you consider such an action at least arrogant and delusional? You most certainly would believe the fellow to be lying, wouldn't you? Hell, I think it's quite blasphemous, myself.
1,104 posted on
02/21/2006 11:46:22 AM PST by
Junior
(Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson