Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Havoc
No, only a moron claims a new species when it is otherwise identifiable readily as the same thing.

Google "corn species" and get back to us -- if what you say is true, there are a vast number of "morons" in the scientific and agricultural communities.

More likely, though, you're the one being an idiot.

Variation within the pre-existing genetics isn't speciation - it is merely variation.

Here's what you're missing, moron -- it's not "within the pre-existing genetics". It's a *different* set of genetics.

And when isolation produces something that can't interbreed, that's a loss, not a gain.

Wrong again, but then we're used to you just making stuff up and posting it as if it were true.

But, then you know that.

No, I don't "know" your falsehood. I try not to contaminate my brain with such utter bulls**t.

852 posted on 02/14/2006 1:35:15 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 828 | View Replies ]


To: Ichneumon
Here's what you're missing, moron -- it's not "within the pre-existing genetics". It's a *different* set of genetics.

I haven't missed that claim, nor am I missing the semantics. It's corn. Just like Irish setter and Great Dane are dogs - Canines. Semantics. You want to hide from the simple in hopes people get lost in the details. It's still corn.

861 posted on 02/14/2006 1:46:40 PM PST by Havoc (Evolutionists and Democrats: "We aren't getting our message out" (coincidence?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 852 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson