You guys think your credentials insulate you and you spit your credentials at those without them as though it were an epithet. Then you have the temerity to whine when someone isn't as impressed with you as you are. We all rather expect your work product to live up to standard. So far, your crowd is giving us arguments that speciation turns corn to corn, flies to flies, ants to ants... note a pattern here..
"For experts, there's no toilet deep enough" - The Russia house
I don't give a damn if your're impressed. If I cared about the opinion of someone who thinks the second law of thermodynamics means radioactive decay rates changed with time, I'd be in sad shape indeed.
LOL--you mean the novel? I think that's a potential tag line.
note a pattern here..
Yes, I note that you're lying about the nature of the evidence we've presented, just like you've lied about so many other things on these threads. You have a pattern of lying, and anti-evolutionists in general have a pattern of lying. I have no problem at all spotting that pattern.
The education and experience of someone like Right Wing Professor means, in the real world, that he knows what he's talking about and that his opinions on the subject are worth paying attention to.
If someone has expertise in a specific area, it is useful to pay attention to that person when discussing that area. For example: