[Californiajones]

Just the facts, here, don't drag me into specious arguments of syntax over the word "species"

(as I vaguely noticed that has occurred previously in the thread.)

Again Darwin's theory INHERENTLY attempts to debunk the Christian God of the Bible as to how life began.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Just the facts, here, don't drag me into specious arguments of syntax over the word "species"

If you can't even name the book correctly, it says a lot about your competence to debate it. It's NOT called the Origins of THE Species; it's On The Origins of Species.

" Again Darwin's theory INHERENTLY attempts to debunk the Christian God of the Bible as to how life began."

And that's a lie. It attempts no such thing, explicitly or *inherently*. Like every scientific theory, it says absolutely nothing about the existence or nonexistence of God. That is why many Christians in Darwin's day readily accepted the book. It was only *anti-Christian* to those whose views of Christianity demanded a literal reading of Genesis.

[Ichneumon]

Again Darwin's theory INHERENTLY attempts to debunk the Christian God of the Bible as to how life began.

This is a blatant lie. But then, lies are the anti-evolutionist's stock-in-trade.

[shuckmaster]

Again Darwin's theory INHERENTLY attempts to debunk the Christian God of the Bible as to how life began

Why are you making a fool of yourself by deliberately lying about what's in a book you obviously haven't read? Are you from that church that believe you can lie your way into heaven. There sure does seem to be a lot of you trolling around since you got your butt kicked in Dover.