Ask Fred. I don't have to misrepresent smoke. And all evolution has done is shovel smoke. There isn't one of you here that could cogently answer Fred's pointed questions without screaching, dismissing or feeding a line of hooey.
Been there done that. If a problem makes you look bad, you cut and run from it at first chance, second chance or whatever chance is most appealing and useful. Macroevolution seems to be the latest.
The theory isn't a single one but a collection of theories that are all moving targets and as likely to half be gone tomorrow and replaced with something else if plausibility
falls apart. Evidence? What's that. We got a rock, want some spin about it with absolutely no proof - sure. But real evidence - nada.
Get real.
You said "Yet we're to believe that corn somehow might produce a stork tomorrow.". The theory of evolution makes no such claims. You are a liar. You are dishonestly misrepresenting the theory of evolution and then tearing down your misrepresentation. Why should I believe you when you're so transparently dishonest?