You said "Yet we're to believe that corn somehow might produce a stork tomorrow.". The theory of evolution makes no such claims. You are a liar. You are dishonestly misrepresenting the theory of evolution and then tearing down your misrepresentation. Why should I believe you when you're so transparently dishonest?
Once again, lets put *your* brain in neutral so you can get it around a notion. *You* have never witnessed speciation. The theory for the moment is irrelevant. If you've never seen it, the theory is a guess at it no matter how smart the people guessing are. Care to go back and look at the gag reals over what "experts" thought flight would look like before two bicycle builders actually did it...
Evolution, to the extent that it exists at all, hasn't read your theory. So, who cares what your theory claims. Really. If you had ever seen speciation actually happen, your theory might have relevance to what one should expect speciation to look like. We've seen everything from p.e. to changes over millions of years. So I pick something on one end for sake of absurdity. Evolution doesn't care how absurd it looks to you or makes you look. It really doesn't. So why should evolution be bound by your theorizing when you've never seen it work. Actually, more than any other question right now, that's one I'd really love to have answered.