I am following up on your comments, seing if you can actually articulate your thoughts to follow up on them. It's called discussion.
You must already know, because you claim to understand evolution well enough to reject it.
Again, no. THis is beside the point, but not factual still.
OK. Do you reject evolution or not? If you do reject evolution then did you examine it carefully first?
I'm asking because I don't understand where your question is coming from. You appear to reject evolution, and I'm sure someone as clever as yourself wouldn't reject something accepted by most scientists without checking what the theory says first, yet your question about speciation implies an astounding level of ignorance on your part about the theory. Really strange.
No, it's called this poster having a long habit of trying to set people up, by asking them questions (often in an intentionally "gotcha" form) in the hopes that he can find something in the answer to nitpick about in a way that he can disingenuously ridicule the respondent for. This is how he plays his favorite "I'm smarter than you idiots" ego game.