[Coyoteman]

"There is a field of archeology referred to as 'forbidden' because technologies uncovered as belonging to the distant past paint a picture incompatible with what the current regime in science wishes to be promulgated as true.

Cites! Cites!

"Forbidden archaeology" is not forbidden, it is laughable.

If there was any good evidence for these claims, they would be mainstream. Instead, they are way out past the fringe.

[Havoc]

No, good evidence is immaterial. If it doesn't fit the controlling regime, it doesn't get anywhere. IE, if it rebuts evolution, overturns popular assumptions, etc. Look at the way ID is being treated simply because it goes against evolution. There is nothing rational in the way it's being shot down without any real review. The controlling regime doesnt' like it, therefore they'll do everything in their power to stop it. Doesn't matter how valid it is.