Replies

"Beg your pardon, Guv'nor -- Are you illiterate, or just stupid?"

No, I just actually understand what Pasteur was doing. You haven't a clue.

"I have ALREADY posted evidentiary citation from the Encyclopedia Brittanica demonstrating that Pasteur's Law of Biogenesis is Fundamental and Universal:"

It also has nothing to do with abiogenesis on the ancient earth.

"By Contrast -- you have, as usual, ZERO counter-argument in favor of the Evolutionist Fantasy of "Random Chemical Abiogenesis"."

I wasn't asked to. You made the ignorant claim that Pasteur had disproved abiogensis (and you erroneously thought this meant evolution). Pasteur did no such thing. Pasteur provided an excellent case against the belief that germs and various insects spring fully formed from decaying food. That is what he showed; creationists are woefully ignorant if they think this means that life couldn't have arisen through natural means 4 billion years ago. Pasteur showed no such thing.

"Orthodox Presbyterians don't "score points" with God. That's not the way our theology works.

As I have already said -- you are presumptuous enough to lecture me on my own Religion, even though you don't know the first thing about it."

Well, your denomination must be very different from every other denomination of Christianity that frowns on lying and rude behavior. In fact, the prohibition against lying is in the Ten Commandments. I assume your denomination accepts them still.

"AT THIS POINT, the Evolutionists are scrambling to come up with a halfway-believable explanation as to WHY there are still-elastic Bone-Marrow Tissues inside T.Rex. Bones, despite the fact that they have assured us all along that the discovery of Preserved Dinosaurian Soft Tissue is Impossible, since it is Biochemically-Impossible for Soft Tissues to last for more than 100,000 years."

It was never said to be impossible. It was said to be improbable. Again, you have misstated what the link said. Typical.

"Typical. And yet, as always, you're still perfectly happy to steal our Creationist Monies, to support your Evolutionist Religion in the Publik Skools."

LOL Funny coming from a theocrat. BTW, buy a dictionary, you can't spell.

It's not up to OP to "disprove" abiogenesis, it is incumbent on you to offer evidence that chemical evolution produced the first replicator. Biogenesis is indeed the law of nature as we know it. Life has never been observed to come from non life.

Abiogenesis , which I have nothing inherently against as a matter of course, being the source of replicators on Earth is not even science by your own definitions. It can never be falsified because it will never be possible to know the initial conditions. You can't observe it and you can't repeat it. In fact, if you were to be honest you'd have to treat it the same way as intelligent design and demand that an out of control federal judge ban it from public schools.

But somehow, I think you will take a pass on that.

No, I just actually understand what Pasteur was doing. You haven't a clue.

Pasteur made a Scientific Prediction concerning the Origin of Life from Non-Life.

"Omne vivum e vivo"

"La génération spontanée est une chimère"

Prove that his Prediction has been disproved -- EVER.

A Scientific Theory which enjoys 100% Predictive Accuracy and Evidentiary Confirmation from all laboratory experimentation, at all times, everywhere... enjoys the status of Scientific Law.

You Evolutionists ASSERT an Exception to Pasteur's Law, on the basis that "You made the ignorant claim that Pasteur had disproved abiogensis (and you erroneously thought this meant evolution). Pasteur did no such thing." You IGNORANT Evolutionist, CANNOT YOU READ LATIN AND FRENCH? Abiogenesis, "La génération spontanée", is precisely what Pasteur was speaking of.

"Omne vivum e vivo" ("Every living thing arises from a preexisting living thing). "La génération spontanée est une chimère" ("Spontaneous generation is a dream").

Pasteur predicted that Life would NEVER arise from Non-Life... and a Scientific Theory which enjoys 100% Predictive Accuracy and Evidentiary Confirmation from all laboratory experimentation, at all times, everywhere -- enjoys the status of Scientific Law.

" That is what he showed; creationists are woefully ignorant if they think this means that life couldn't have arisen through natural means 4 billion years ago. Pasteur showed no such thing."

Oh really? - It looks like your little pile of Barbara Streisand has blown up in your ignorant face, huh? Do you even have any idea who Pasteur was? Do you ever get embarrassed when your lies are exposed? I didn't think so; it's all a part of the morality of 'abiogenesis.' Smells like swamp gas around here, Phew!