To: CarolinaGuitarman
" That is what he showed; creationists are woefully ignorant if they think this means that life couldn't have arisen through natural means 4 billion years ago. Pasteur showed no such thing." Oh really? - It looks like your little pile of Barbara Streisand has blown up in your ignorant face, huh? Do you even have any idea who Pasteur was? Do you ever get embarrassed when your lies are exposed? I didn't think so; it's all a part of the morality of 'abiogenesis.' Smells like swamp gas around here, Phew!
1,956 posted on
02/17/2006 12:41:15 PM PST by
editor-surveyor
(Atheist and Fool are synonyms; Evolution is where fools hide from the sunrise)
To: editor-surveyor
" Oh really? - It looks like your little pile of Barbara Streisand has blown up in your ignorant face, huh? "
No, I am correct. Pasteur was not talking about the origins of the first life forms, he was talking about the reproduction of life since then. He showed that things like bacteria and insects (maggots) don't form spontaneously from rotting foods. He made no biochemical claims about the formation of life on the ancient earth.
"Do you even have any idea who Pasteur was?"
Do you? Please tell us what experiments he performed. You seem to have no idea what he actually did.
"Do you ever get embarrassed when your lies are exposed? "
Everything I have said is true, you are the one *misspeaking* (that's what anti-evos call lying these days).
"Smells like swamp gas around here, Phew!"
Take a bath then.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson