Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: CarolinaGuitarman; xzins; Dr. Eckleburg; jude24; RnMomof7; PatrickHenry; Right Wing Professor
Sorry, it [Pasteur's Law] has nothing to say about abiogenesis. You are very misinformed.

Beg your pardon, Guv'nor -- Are you illiterate, or just stupid?

I have ALREADY posted evidentiary citation from the Encyclopedia Brittanica demonstrating that Pasteur's Law of Biogenesis is Fundamental and Universal:

By Contrast -- you have, as usual, ZERO counter-argument in favor of the Evolutionist Fantasy of "Random Chemical Abiogenesis". There's a reason for this, of course -- Evolutionists like to ASSERT for themselves a "primordial chemical soup" Exception to Pasteur's Scientific Law of Biogenesis, but of course such an Exception has never been Proven, or even Evidenced; Evolutionists just like their Monopoly over Government School Financing.

State-Established Religions usually do.

BTW, you're unchristian behavior isn't getting you any points with God.

Oh, give me a break.

Orthodox Presbyterians don't "score points" with God. That's not the way our theology works.

As I have already said -- you are presumptuous enough to lecture me on my own Religion, even though you don't know the first thing about it.

Typical Closed-Minded Evolutionist Arrogance.

If you actually read the link, you would know that *soft* isn't what you claim it is. Then again, you have reading troubles, I am asking too much of you. The creationists lied through their teeth about what was discovered.

I did read the Link. In fact, I read it in its entirety.

Try reading your own bloody Citation, you emotionally-invested dilettante.

AT THIS POINT, the Evolutionists are scrambling to come up with a halfway-believable explanation as to WHY there are still-elastic Bone-Marrow Tissues inside T.Rex. Bones, despite the fact that they have assured us all along that the discovery of Preserved Dinosaurian Soft Tissue is Impossible, since it is Biochemically-Impossible for Soft Tissues to last for more than 100,000 years.

OOPS. Just one more thing that Evolutionism got wrong, flubbed its Predictive Value as a Theory YET AGAIN.

Typical. And yet, as always, you're still perfectly happy to steal our Creationist Monies, to support your Evolutionist Religion in the Publik Skools.

Tax-suckling Evolutionist LEECHES.

1,821 posted on 02/17/2006 9:48:14 AM PST by OrthodoxPresbyterian (We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty - Luke 17:10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1803 | View Replies ]


To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
since it is Biochemically-Impossible for Soft Tissues to last for more than 100,000 years.

I guess a good lie is worth repeating over and over, eh, OP?

What's Presbyterian for 'Al-Taqiya'?

1,824 posted on 02/17/2006 9:52:38 AM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1821 | View Replies ]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
"Beg your pardon, Guv'nor -- Are you illiterate, or just stupid?"

No, I just actually understand what Pasteur was doing. You haven't a clue.

"I have ALREADY posted evidentiary citation from the Encyclopedia Brittanica demonstrating that Pasteur's Law of Biogenesis is Fundamental and Universal:"

It also has nothing to do with abiogenesis on the ancient earth.

"By Contrast -- you have, as usual, ZERO counter-argument in favor of the Evolutionist Fantasy of "Random Chemical Abiogenesis"."

I wasn't asked to. You made the ignorant claim that Pasteur had disproved abiogensis (and you erroneously thought this meant evolution). Pasteur did no such thing. Pasteur provided an excellent case against the belief that germs and various insects spring fully formed from decaying food. That is what he showed; creationists are woefully ignorant if they think this means that life couldn't have arisen through natural means 4 billion years ago. Pasteur showed no such thing.

"Orthodox Presbyterians don't "score points" with God. That's not the way our theology works.

As I have already said -- you are presumptuous enough to lecture me on my own Religion, even though you don't know the first thing about it."

Well, your denomination must be very different from every other denomination of Christianity that frowns on lying and rude behavior. In fact, the prohibition against lying is in the Ten Commandments. I assume your denomination accepts them still.

"AT THIS POINT, the Evolutionists are scrambling to come up with a halfway-believable explanation as to WHY there are still-elastic Bone-Marrow Tissues inside T.Rex. Bones, despite the fact that they have assured us all along that the discovery of Preserved Dinosaurian Soft Tissue is Impossible, since it is Biochemically-Impossible for Soft Tissues to last for more than 100,000 years."

It was never said to be impossible. It was said to be improbable. Again, you have misstated what the link said. Typical.

"Typical. And yet, as always, you're still perfectly happy to steal our Creationist Monies, to support your Evolutionist Religion in the Publik Skools."

LOL Funny coming from a theocrat. BTW, buy a dictionary, you can't spell.
1,832 posted on 02/17/2006 10:17:27 AM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1821 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson