[CarolinaGuitarman]

" As to the Ark, I'm just using a legal prerogative that eyewitness accounts trump circumstantial evidence most times."

Since neither of us have been there, we are both relying on other people's accounts. If you are going to say that your evidence is better than mine, you have to actually present an argument as to why this is so. I stand by the evidence (which isn't *circumstantial*) that the claims for an ark on Mt Ararat are demonstrated hoaxes. You refuse to address this and instead make silly demands like telling me to go and take my own pictures.

" No need to get huffy. You have "evolved" past that, I'm sure?"

I get heated when someone insults my intelligence with silly arguments while evading the issues I raised.

[Californiajones]

Actually, I didn't say my evidence was "better" than yours. I said that eyewitness accounts usually trump circumstantial evidence -- (though not always) in a legal argument.