To: CarolinaGuitarman
Actually, I didn't say my evidence was "better" than yours. I said that eyewitness accounts usually trump circumstantial evidence -- (though not always) in a legal argument.
1,542 posted on
02/15/2006 3:17:43 PM PST by
Californiajones
("The apprehension of beauty is the cure for apathy" - Thomas Aquinas)
To: Californiajones
Actually, I didn't say my evidence was "better" than yours. I said that eyewitness accounts usually trump circumstantial evidence -- (though not always) in a legal argument.Physical evidence trumps both. Most cops know that eyewitness evidence is weak. Ask three people about the same event and you'll get 5 stories. Its true that courts like it though.
1,543 posted on
02/15/2006 3:21:03 PM PST by
Thatcherite
(More abrasive blackguard than SeaLion or ModernMan)
To: Californiajones
"Actually, I didn't say my evidence was "better" than yours. I said that eyewitness accounts usually trump circumstantial evidence -- (though not always) in a legal argument."
This is funny! In the same breath you say you don;t claim to have better evidence than you say you have better evidence. lol BTW, the evidence I provided isn't circumstantial. Your *eyewitnesses* lied. This has been demonstrated. I know you didn't actually READ the links I gave you; that's no excuse for your ignorance.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson