[Californiajones]

Like I just said to another Evo, the surest way to prove the existence of the Ark is to see for oneself.

No need to get personal; we surely have "evolved" beyond that?

[Ichneumon]

Like I just said to another Evo, the surest way to prove the existence of the Ark is to see for oneself.

No, it would not -- that only demonstrates the existence of *something* which is visible enough to photographed. It in no way establishes what it *is*. And the analyses which have already been done on that thing on Ararat establishes quite well what it is (a sedimentary formation) and what it is not (remains of the Ark, or any other boat for that matter).

Are you being lamely coy, or just missing the point yet again?

[whattajoke]

Like I just said to another Evo, the surest way to prove the existence of the Ark is to see for oneself.

of course. The ol' "Were you THERE" lame defense. California, you do realize how absurd this is, right? Your worldview is reduced to your house, yard, car interior, and workplace. Are we really fighting a war in Iraq? Do the SI Swimsuit models REALLY look like that (Damn fine crop this year)?

WERE YOU THERE?