Correction, the tech thing was another evo's moonbat theory, yours is that we reject science in general because we might disagree with some findings. To which I'd respond, a little more easily that we don't opt out of flying because it's science anymore than we opt out of the latest detergent. How old the earth is doesn't bother anything but your ideology. And I stand by my prior statement, if it can hold up to serious scrutiny, it has nothing to fear. If it can't, science is self correcting. (good evo answers I get often)
So, do you reject or endorse those mainstream non-evolutionary scientific findings? In amongst your obfuscation and wriggling you haven't posted a definite answer.