[Thatcherite]

Correction, the tech thing was another evo's moonbat theory, yours is that we reject science in general because we might disagree with some findings. To which I'd respond, a little more easily that we don't opt out of flying because it's science anymore than we opt out of the latest detergent. How old the earth is doesn't bother anything but your ideology. And I stand by my prior statement, if it can hold up to serious scrutiny, it has nothing to fear. If it can't, science is self correcting. (good evo answers I get often)

So, do you reject or endorse those mainstream non-evolutionary scientific findings? In amongst your obfuscation and wriggling you haven't posted a definite answer.

[Havoc]

I think I gave you a clear answer. Do you have a comprehension problem.

[Havoc]

My answer forces you to think and puts you in suspense because it's a straight answer that could mean yes or no depending on whether the findings would hold up to serious scrutiny. If they could, you'd be satisfied. Evidently they can't so you're not; but, you can't say that. See why I like the answer. Just kills you that you can't get what you want and even if you do, your point that you wish to make from it doesn't follow logically. Anyway you cut it, you're holding a losing hand and beside yourself that you can't get me.

Since you're in suspense, I'm going to bed. Mumble on.