Just to confirm that you don't reject science, and it is just evolution that you reject, which of the following mainstream findings of non-evolutionary science do you endorse?
The thing that scares you is that your ideology might not recieve public funding anymore and that it may possibly force people to do actual science. No more gravy train. And wouldn't it be aweful if science was held to standards that required results. How aweful. Moaning and gnashing of teeth to be sure. The boogie man will get you.. booo.
As I don't make my living out of science in any way shape or form your question has no application to my circumstances.
Ah, evolutionist dogma. Not science. Thought you were going to tell us all that we're trying to wreck science - you know, a mover of our economy, etc. You're interested in trying to play a shell game to say one thing when you're really trying to protect dogma by lying. I would say, if the science is accurate, you have nothing to fear, if it's not, then you should fear for your dogma, not science. lol. Kinda thought science was self correcting anyway.. isn't that the refrain?
As for whether you yourself make money from science, I didn't infer it. I merely posited there'd likely be no more free rides and that ideologues might actually have to work for a living producing real science instead of wasting taxpayer money on fairytales.