Ah, evolutionist dogma. Not science. Thought you were going to tell us all that we're trying to wreck science - you know, a mover of our economy, etc. You're interested in trying to play a shell game to say one thing when you're really trying to protect dogma by lying. I would say, if the science is accurate, you have nothing to fear, if it's not, then you should fear for your dogma, not science. lol. Kinda thought science was self correcting anyway.. isn't that the refrain?
As for whether you yourself make money from science, I didn't infer it. I merely posited there'd likely be no more free rides and that ideologues might actually have to work for a living producing real science instead of wasting taxpayer money on fairytales.
Your response is total gibberish.
Is there any chance of actually answering my questions about whether you reject or endorse those sample scientific findings that I posted? You claim that your beef is with evolution and not with science in general. Why the coyness about those non-evolutionary examples then? Now is your opportunity to show that your only argument is with evolution by making it clear that you accept the findings of the physical and earth sciences. Or do you?