To: freedumb2003; staytrue; Havoc
So when you try to engage him in debate, he resorts to ad hominem attacks You've got the unmitigated gall to post that, when you have entered this thread with this....
To: Havoc
Hey, slurpee-slinger
Do you think your Junior College "education" puts you in any position to debate this with your betters?
Your "endless monkees" argument is similar to the "tornado creating a 747 from a trailer park" strawman argument.
More lies.
But that is what you do, right liar? Or should I say "serial liar?"
1,114 posted on 02/15/2006 12:36:49 AM EST by freedumb2003 (American troops cannot be defeated. American Politicians can.) |
1,141 posted on
02/14/2006 9:56:13 PM PST by
AndrewC
(Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
To: AndrewC
"Liar" is not ad hominem.
1,142 posted on
02/14/2006 9:57:04 PM PST by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: AndrewC
I guess you don't know what "ad hominem" means.
I admit to the "slurpee slinger" but it also points to the fact that he doesn't have valid "quals."
He is a proven liar and that fact shades his attempts at "argumentation."
1,149 posted on
02/14/2006 10:05:31 PM PST by
freedumb2003
(American troops cannot be defeated. American Politicians can.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson