In other words, both of Joran's petitions were rejected outright by the Judge!
That is great news! Guess Aruba is finally feeling the pressure!!
Now I want to hear that the civil case with Kelly is going forward against Juran!
"Aruba is finally feeling the pressure!!"
Of course they are....no tourists. But nothing has really changed....jorans "case" today was just a motion for dismissal. There is no real reason to dismiss it, and the boycott is on. But in reality, joran ALREADY was "suspect" for a period of 2 years from the day he was proclaimed a suspect, which would not have expired until June of '07. So if "a year and a half" means anything more than that, they failed to state it....but what is written above is correct, his liability as suspect was extended bt 3 months.
Either way, big deal....the beat goes on and on and we get lipservice and letdown after letdown from aruba. All they did was avoid an appearance that would increase displeasure with aruba.....and potentially the continuance as a suspect without more evidence will affect the US action in a way favorable to the VDS's.
This is a pig in a poke, and likely mollifies those in aruba that are angry over what joran has wrought on them.
JMO, of course.
Court date for the civil case is 5/17 for arguments before N.Y. Judge. Papers filed by both parties supposed to be on findlaw. Tacopina said according to poster I read on SM if he can't get the case thrown out for lack of jurisdiction, he would recommend the Sloots default.