How about this: PROVE TO US that there is not a greater occurence of the virus that causes AIDS among male homosexuals, in comparison with that rate of frequency among heterosexuals.
In fact, that question has been posed to you many times over in this thread, and you've -- to use your own language -- you've REFUSED to RESPOND to it.
So, how about it? Prove to us that your position is tenuable, actual, proven. Prove to us that there is, as you allege, "more AIDS" among heterosexuals than among homosexuals. By percentages, not by overall population numbers, given that homosexuals are a mere two, three percent of the overall human population.
In ANY country, as in, the human species, with reference to or not any nation, since that's also an issue you've raised ("America" and all).
Last thing here is that I've posted many times that you've been identified as engaging in falsehoods. Since I have no way of knowing what your intentions are to any point of fact, I can't describe you as "lying" (which is a statement about intentions) but I can describe you as having posted INACCURATE AND MISLEADING statements and many times over here, including misrepresenting actual information and the statements of others.
However, since you do not know me, either, there is no way possible you can know what my intentions are, here, anywhere else, and thus, you continuing to call me "a liar" and write that I am "lying" is just more of YOU deceiving, authoring inaccuracies and untruths.
More reason to feel very sorry for your unpleasant perspectives. I have no idea why you are motivated to denigrate others in defense of, apparently, homosexual behaviors.
The thread, by the way, isn't about that. It's about the fact that no gene has ever been identified that would substantiate any immutable characteristic to homosexuality, and that, therefore, homosexuality remains behavioral.
There was never any question or issue raised by the thread article to or about the virus that causes AIDS nor the rate of transmission, until you wrote that there was a greater rate of AIDS among heterosexuals than among homosexuals. Which is completely false, by the way, and remains unsubstantiated by you, as by anyone else.
How about this: PROVE TO US that there is not a greater occurence of the virus that causes AIDS among male homosexuals, in comparison with that rate of frequency among heterosexuals.
---
Why would I do that? I never claimed that. What interest do I have in proving a claim that I never made? Perhaps you can offer a link to me making that claim..
--
So, how about it? Prove to us that your position is tenuable, actual, proven. Prove to us that there is, as you allege, "more AIDS" among heterosexuals than among homosexuals. By percentages, not by overall population numbers, given that homosexuals are a mere two, three percent of the overall human population
--
Why by percentages? I never made any claims about percentages. I simply stated that worldwide the greater number of AIDS victims are heterosexual. I made no comments about percentages. Please, try to argue against claims I have actually made.
--
However, since you do not know me, either, there is no way possible you can know what my intentions are, here, anywhere else, and thus, you continuing to call me "a liar" and write that I am "lying" is just more of YOU deceiving, authoring inaccuracies and untruths.
---
Well, I have pointed out to you with evidence that I was not the first person to introduce the concept of naturalness to the argument.
--
More reason to feel very sorry for your unpleasant perspectives. I have no idea why you are motivated to denigrate others in defense of, apparently, homosexual behaviors
--
I do not defend homosexual behaviours. I am neutral towards them. Frankly, they are none of my concern. Unless a man rapes me or someone else, why care what he does with his member?