How about this: PROVE TO US that there is not a greater occurence of the virus that causes AIDS among male homosexuals, in comparison with that rate of frequency among heterosexuals.
---
Why would I do that? I never claimed that. What interest do I have in proving a claim that I never made? Perhaps you can offer a link to me making that claim..
--
So, how about it? Prove to us that your position is tenuable, actual, proven. Prove to us that there is, as you allege, "more AIDS" among heterosexuals than among homosexuals. By percentages, not by overall population numbers, given that homosexuals are a mere two, three percent of the overall human population
--
Why by percentages? I never made any claims about percentages. I simply stated that worldwide the greater number of AIDS victims are heterosexual. I made no comments about percentages. Please, try to argue against claims I have actually made.
--
However, since you do not know me, either, there is no way possible you can know what my intentions are, here, anywhere else, and thus, you continuing to call me "a liar" and write that I am "lying" is just more of YOU deceiving, authoring inaccuracies and untruths.
---
Well, I have pointed out to you with evidence that I was not the first person to introduce the concept of naturalness to the argument.
--
More reason to feel very sorry for your unpleasant perspectives. I have no idea why you are motivated to denigrate others in defense of, apparently, homosexual behaviors
--
I do not defend homosexual behaviours. I am neutral towards them. Frankly, they are none of my concern. Unless a man rapes me or someone else, why care what he does with his member?
MillerCreek said "How about this: PROVE TO US that there is not a greater occurence of the virus that causes AIDS among male homosexuals, in comparison with that rate of frequency among heterosexuals."
You denied making the claim. Yet in post 270 you said:
Worldwide, the major source of HIV infection is heterosexual sex.There's your link.
A lot of people "care about" homosexuals and the impact homosexuality behaviors have upon society, even their own neighborhoods.
To write that "who care what (a homosexual) does with his member" is nonsense, since many people do care and it's obvious from just reading today that the issue poses concern to many human beings, worldwide.
Another thing and that is calling someone "a liar" as you have me indicates a great deal of negative EMOTION about someone's statement/s. Why not simply clarify and move on? Your resort and so soon to a total stranger (I think, since I have no idea who you are nor have I ever viewed your comments anywhere else on FR, nor commented to or about them) by applying pejoratives indicates you are responding to some unidentified element here with a greater deal of negative emotion than is appropriate to public, impersonal discussion.
Not once, but repeatedly, you've applied forceful language to attempt to denigrate much of what I've written here, labelling statements as "lies" when they are anything but. You also have no process by which you could possibly establish any moral condition to my comments with any specificity so why the default to "lying" when, in fact, the usual response would be to attempt to clarify some misunderstanding, to provide greater information or ignore.
You, instead, attempt to assign negative characteristics to mere statements here that, actually, are supported by academics, despite the fact that you may not and are not aware of that. In which case, usually, people ask and if denied, move on.
I consider your ongoing "you're a liar" to be not only odd, but to be deceitful in the sense that it reflects your need to denigrate me rather than establish truth, accuracy.
However, it's been established that you've misrepresented and alluded to other rather outrageous distortions and then blamed others when asked to substantiate or explain further.
In which case, there's no discussion here. I and a few others have asked quite specific questions as to some of what you've written and what you do rather than respond to that is paste the comments of others over again and bury your ongoing pejoratives among those.
I've seen your behavior before on the internet and it has always indicated someone who is not concerned with the information being discussed by others but indicates, instead, a need to create disharmony, disorder, confuse and avoid.
Thus, I again write, you are trolling.