Let's see...you alleged that I "lied" when you alleged falsely that I'd "said" that "AIDS originated from homosexuals" (and you claimed the CDC "disagreed with [me], too"!)...
Which is YOU "lying," by the way, but most people, being reasonable, will allow confusions by whomever to pass by with a friendly correction, apology, perhaps additional information.
You did not provide any of that.
Then you claimed, as you reiterate now, this latest comment of yours, that I "lied" when I "said (you) introduced the topic of natural in regard to homosexuality" -- in my experience, you were the first to introduce it in the context that I cited and when and how.
That's not disproven. Thus, you have, in fact, lied.
Do you recognize "lying" as being different an intentionally misleading act?
I ask because, otherwise, using the term ("you're a liar", "you lied") as pejorative, is, in effect, a lie in and of itself.
You (also) wrote that you weren't going to "discuss" anything with me any longer and yet, here you are, and thus, another lie!
Seriously, this is not a tag team format, here. It's sad that you perceive it as such.
In my experience, having not encountered in my area of discussions on this thread prior to your statements, anyone referring to homosexuality as "natural," you were he/she who introduced the term and thus, I wrote alll about that, quite a while ago.
What I've concluded is that you're slumming and trolling. You're just wearing out the thread that was, originally, worthwhile, for whatever motivations but the result is destructive, and you've engaged in harassing the very worth and contributions of others, in my experience, and many, many times over again.
Go ahead and "call" me any of your names, any of your terms, it doesn't bother me. I feel sorry for you, is all.
Let's see...you alleged that I "lied" when you alleged falsely that I'd "said" that "AIDS originated from homosexuals" (and you claimed the CDC "disagreed with [me], too"!)...
Which is YOU "lying," by the way, but most people, being reasonable, will allow confusions by whomever to pass by with a friendly correction, apology, perhaps additional information.
--
Wrong. The only time I said you lied was when you claimed I was the one who introduced the word natural to the discussion. And you did say that
"HIV originated in persons engaged in homosexual activity".
I posted the link to that post of your and quoted you.
--
Then you claimed, as you reiterate now, this latest comment of yours, that I "lied" when I "said (you) introduced the topic of natural in regard to homosexuality" -- in my experience, you were the first to introduce it in the context that I cited and when and how.
That's not disproven. Thus, you have, in fact, lied.
--
Yes it was disproven. I posted a link to the post that I replied to which was the first I saw to mention naturalness of sexuality.
--
In my experience, having not encountered in my area of discussions on this thread prior to your statements, anyone referring to homosexuality as "natural," you were he/she who introduced the term and thus, I wrote alll about that, quite a while ago.
--
I didnt refer to it as natural. I asked if someone else would call it natural.
--
What I've concluded is that you're slumming and trolling. You're just wearing out the thread that was, originally, worthwhile, for whatever motivations but the result is destructive, and you've engaged in harassing the very worth and contributions of others, in my experience, and many, many times over again.
--
All I ask for is ONE piece of evidence that HIV "originated in persons engaged in homosexual activities"
--