Speaking of remedial education, perhaps you too can make us marvel and swoon. You can start by spelling consummation correctly. And once you have that honed to a science, you can tell your new friend that the girl likely was 12 when she conceived. Also, Brainiac, we don't know their exact birthdays, but Little Hypocrite made the point about her being such the older woman who led the young lad astray. For all we know, he could be only a week younger.
Why is that Little Churchie didn't tell us that? Perhaps he was too busy with ad hominems?
As you might have gathered by now, I don't suffer fools gladly, or their knights in shining armor. Have a Miserable New Year....
Do you know the difference between venom and reasoned argument? And if you're not posting to influence people, are you just posting to see your own words in print somewhere ?
And a sack of crap who agrees with someone who calls 13 year old girls little whores doesn't deserve a scintilla of respect.
Does your mother know that you talk to strangers in the middle of the night on your computer?
And neither do you, Brainiac, for substantively ignoring the ad hominem of remedial education.
What post was that in?
Speaking of remedial education, perhaps you too can make us marvel and swoon. You can start by spelling consummation correctly.
Well, you knew the standard technique of running a post through a spell-checker for cheap points. But you still haven't made it clear what your views actually were about the young couple in question.
And once you have that honed to a science, you can tell your new friend that the girl likely was 12 when she conceived. Also, Brainiac, we don't know their exact birthdays, but Little Hypocrite made the point about her being such the older woman who led the young lad astray. For all we know, he could be only a week younger.
Why are these points important to you? You have the data, now tell us your conclusion.
Why is that Little Churchie didn't tell us that? Perhaps he was too busy with ad hominems?
Where were Little Jeremiah's ad hominems? Calling a 13-year old a whore is criticizing her behaviour, not a logical disputation.
As you might have gathered by now, I don't suffer fools gladly, or their knights in shining armor. Have a Miserable New Year....
That's okay, you're not talking to a fool. And my armor is quite dented from long usage.
Cheers!
I never made the point or considered the girl in question "an older woman who led the young lad astray". I think the flying spittle is obscuring your vision.
And grey_whiskers made a valid point (actually he made many valid points) - slut or whore means one who fornicates promiscuously. Since we don't know if she was doing that, she may not have been technically a slut or whore. But I was using the term to denote illicit sex, out of marriage, and at an age where marriage is not even a possibility.