[caffe]

You are still in denial: not one tiny proof exists to support Darwin or Neo-Darwin evolution. Yet there is plenty of proof about how evolutionists are good at adaptation when their lies are exposed.

Again, I have many scientists in my family , even a Harvard graduate, and we are creationists with a capital C. Being a creationist has no bearing on the ability to understand science - it simply states you dismiss philosophy posing as science.

[Dimensio]

You are still in denial: not one tiny proof exists to support Darwin or Neo-Darwin evolution.

Science doesn't deal in "proofs". If you had any understanding of the scientific method you would know this.

Again, I have many scientists in my family , even a Harvard graduate, and we are creationists with a capital C.

This is not an uncommon tactic: appeal to unnamed friends or family members as "scientists" who accept creationism. No names are given, and rarely are we even told the field of science the alleged relative practices.

[Coyoteman]

You are still in denial: not one tiny proof exists to support Darwin or Neo-Darwin evolution.

Since everyone knows scientific theories can't be proved, the next best thing we have is evidence. And there is a lot of evidence.

Here's one example now...

---

Herto skulls (Homo sapiens idaltu)

Some new fossils from Herto in Ethiopia, are the oldest known modern human fossils, at 160,000 yrs. The discoverers have assigned them to a new subspecies, Homo sapiens idaltu, and say that they are anatomically and chronologically intermediate between older archaic humans and more recent fully modern humans. Their age and anatomy is cited as strong evidence for the emergence of modern humans from Africa, and against the multiregional theory which argues that modern humans evolved in many places around the world.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/herto.html

[Jo Nuvark]

Darwin Quote #2.6. [Re: "lack" of transitional fossils]

But, as by this theory, innumerable transitional forms
must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in
countless numbers in the crust of the earth?" (Origin of
Species, 1859).

[narby]

You are still in denial:

Then I'm in good company.

[whattajoke]

I have many scientists in my family, even a Harvard graduate, and we are creationists with a capital C.

Tricky punctuation, caffe. So, one can assume the "Harvard graduate" isn't necessarily a scientist. And if he/she is, how do I put this politely... SO WHAT?