Posted on 12/20/2005 7:54:38 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
As an atheist I wouldn't expect any other answers from you, which we have heard over and over and over....
Since you are an atheist, it is understandable that you don't want anything religious taught anywhere. As a Christian, I have the same rights as you and can send my children to where they will learn the truth.
So if a kid asks what alternative theories are there to evolution, the teacher isn't allowed to say?
Also, where does the judge get off saying the ID people lied about their motives? Where is the evidence for that. It would seem to me that this is a clear sign of heavy bias from the judge and grounds for an appeal.
I'm unaware of any genocide by the West. Countries who've adopted elements of Western culture, like India and Japan, seem to be doing OK.
Places where they haven't, like Africa, Asia and the Middle East, aren't doing as well.
The folks who got treated the worst were probably the native North Americans. The Spaniards didn't do very well developing their territories either.
It depends on who you're comparing the West to. China, Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia simply killed people they didn't like. You can pick atrocities in Africa all day long.
The Muslims did much worse than what happened in the Americas. We're not cutting off the hands and feet of the native Americans and torturing them randomly.
What other culture has spent it's money and the lives of it's citizens to bring freedom to strangers?
But it does give you an escape hatch to cry about insults. So that works well in your situation.
Bringing cross burning into this discussion is just absolutely disingenuous.
The ban has nothing to do with the symbol's connection with religion, it is based on the fact that it is a means of intimidating someone.
I stand corrected. The terms were not coined by modern creationists, but rather by a Russian orthogeneticist by the name of Iurii Filipchenko in 1927. It does raise the question of credibility regarding creationists today using terms that belonged to a long discredited theory of new species being the product of spontaneous generation though, and at any rate they are not embraced by modern evolutionists.
Thanks for posting that. I've had questions about the award of attorney fees.
I'm asking you which religion ID by definition is attempting to establish? Is it a particularly Jewish, Christian, or Muslim idea? Which religion does organized matter espouse?
ID was created as a stealth attempt to get one version of Christianity into science classes. It is warmed-over "Creation Science". That has been well-documented, in this case and elsewhere.
"Is not God in control? Was God powerless to prevent the damage caused by Katrina? Is God impotent in the face of Mother Nature? Is Mother Nature capable of thwarting God's will? If so, then Mother Nature is God."
You have it. I think you have it!
Evidence:
Fossil: KNM-ER 3733 Site: Koobi Fora (Upper KBS tuff, area 104), Lake Turkana, Kenya (4, 1)
Discovered By: B. Ngeneo, 1975 (1)
Estimated Age of Fossil: 1.75 mya * determined by Stratigraphic, faunal, paleomagnetic & radiometric data (1, 4)
Species Name: Homo ergaster (1, 7, 8), Homo erectus (3, 4, 7), Homo erectus ergaster (25)
Gender: Female (species presumed to be sexually dimorphic) (1, 8)
Cranial Capacity: 850 cc (1, 3, 4)
Information: Tools found in same layer (8, 9). Found with KNM-ER 406- A. boisei (effectively eliminating single species hypothesis) (1)
Interpretation: Adult (based on cranial sutures, molar eruption and dental wear) (1)
See original source for notes:
Source: http://www.mos.org/evolution/fossils/fossilview.php?fid=33
LOL! Which particular version of Christianity does organized matter espouse?
Now what son?
I'd like to see the good people of Dover sue the deposed school board members personally for these costs. They didn't want this fight, they booted the liars out of office when they had a chance, why should they have to pay the court costs of these bums?
The people responsible for the mess should shoulder the costs involved.
An honest scientist would pose this as a null hypothesis and begin attempting to falsify it. Which is what molecular biologists are doing when they study the various abiogenesis hypotheses that don't exist.
There are many problems in science that cannot be solved in an afternoon. How many years passed between Copernicus and Newton, or between Newton and Einstein? How long did it take to build a coherent table of chemical elements? Do we have one now?
That I agree with....to believe in God takes faith. However, the evolution theorists and big bang theorists expect us to accept what they say as fact when it is unproven. I guess they want us to believe what they say based on faith.
A belief in nothing is past sad.
Well, I'm pro-all-those. JimRob left out pro-genuine-science, but since he's hosted all these crevo threads I've got to think he is.
We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc.
Well, that's good too. He doesn't oppose evolution. And since evolution isn't athiesm or junk-science, or any of those other things, no problem.
You'll have to ask them - it's their policial agenda, not mine.
They thought it espoused Christianity. I think it's silly, but that's what they were trying to do. If you disagree, take it up with them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.