Replies

Ich:"....Have you no shame?..."

Notice how much it takes to refute one of my arguments...a zillion words...of mostly extracted copied and modified rubbish. Hey whatever gets you thru the night...

Yep, we all got your answer Eleni. Ichneumon goes to the trouble of carefully providing a detailed point-by-point refutation of lies that you perpetuate and you respond with an airy handwave.

You are utterly without shame, and the evidence is there for all to see.

Pinging aamm in because you seem to like this kind of stuff.

You know, this "500 theses about Piltdown" lie a few posts up in the thread has reminded me of an FR crevo classic.

Do you remember the guy who had the same bugbear, that somehow Piltdown was a major plank of evolutionary beliefs. In promotion of his belief he posted a list of about 15 scientific papers that cited Piltdown...

Problem was, that when you examined the papers they came up as follows:

2 or 3 of them were the descriptions of the original finds.
2 or 3 of them were quite long articles that mentioned Piltdown once as a footnote
About 10 of them were post-debunk, and mentioned Piltdown as something that had been debunked
And the crowning glory of the list was "The Lost World", by Conan Doyle

The frantic weaseling by the poster when his error was pointed out was wondrous to behold. In an effort to deflect the subject he then posted another list to demonstrate the mendacity/gullibility of paleontologists. This was papers about "Brontosaurus". Naturally enough google was once again his friend (hurrah!), and he managed to find and include in his list, "Bully for Brontosaurus" by Gould.

Ich (mongoose or tracker?) went to a lot of trouble for nothing. He/She posts stuff from Evo sites whose business it is to undermine Creationist sites. Laughable if not downright absurd.

Well guess what...he went to a lot trouble for nothing. Lots of words and sites do not make for proof of anything...but rather just a lot of hot stinky evo air.