No need to review ... "religious folk" clearly know where the hate lies.
More to the point is that the monopoly that evolution holds over academia warps the research that should be going on.
Evo theory has cornered the market so to speak on new ways of looking at life on earth. Further, the gaps, illogical leaps, outright lies in the field of evolution has undermined what real science - a science not cahined to secularism - could be doing. Evos have decided that undermining Christian origin beliefs is their primary mission. Very sad that science has deteriorated to this low point.
Evo theory has cornered the market so to speak on new ways of looking at life on earth. Further, the gaps, illogical leaps, outright lies in the field of evolution has undermined what real science - a science not cahined to secularism - could be doing.
Name an "outright lie" please. State how it has "undermined" real science. Also, please state how science would be improved by adhering to a religion, name that religion, and please state specifically why it is better than all the other religions insofar as science is concerned.
Evos have decided that undermining Christian origin beliefs is their primary mission. Very sad that science has deteriorated to this low point.
Please don't quit your day job. Your mind-reading act leaves much to be desired.
Please look back on this thread and see where the hate actually lies. It is quite clear. That is why post #70, for example, was removed by the moderators. (References to its content are in some following posts.) I have yet to see the kind of hate directed at "evilutionists" from our side. Scorn, derision, and outright laughter--yes, but not hate. And there is a difference.
As far as your comment that "Evos have decided that undermining Christian origin beliefs is their primary mission"--this is false.
I have mentioned on these threads that I spent half of my graduate school time and half of my Ph.D. study on fossil man/human osteology, and never once did creation science come up (ID had not been invented at the time). There was simply no mention of "undermining Christian origin beliefs." Science does science, and (hopefully) religion does religion.
I don't know where you are getting your information about "evos" but I can tell you from my experience that a lot of it is simply wrong.
"Evos have decided that undermining Christian origin beliefs is their primary mission."
That is, in fact, their only intent. Thank God there are so few of them and so many of us.