[Baraonda]

"Theories" are not "speculation".

And you're right for most theories.

But I was talking specifically about the theory of evolution, and it's generally accepted (actually it's almost a law) that evolution is made up of speculations, assumptions, unsubstantiated "facts," unobservable "observations, sub/semi-theories all topped with a sprinkle of lies as the final touch to give it the appearance of a solid theory, which is not of course.

Now, that is my educated opinion on the subject. But you may have a different take on the nebulous theory of evolution and that does not necessarily make you a bad person - only a misinformed one.

[Dimensio]

But I was talking specifically about the theory of evolution, and it's generally accepted (actually it's almost a law) that evolution is made up of speculations, assumptions, unsubstantiated "facts," unobservable "observations, sub/semi-theories all topped with a sprinkle of lies as the final touch to give it the appearance of a solid theory, which is not of course.

And I'm sure that you can explain exactly how this is the case.

Oh, wait, you can't. You just come in here and fire baseless pot-shots at evolution without referencing a single fact. And you ignore any factual information presented to you, dismissing it without even looking at it, because you -- like so many other creationists -- don't care that you have to use lies to support your agenda.

[Quark2005]

But I was talking specifically about the theory of evolution, and it's generally accepted (actually it's almost a law) that evolution is made up of speculations, assumptions, unsubstantiated "facts," unobservable "observations, sub/semi-theories all topped with a sprinkle of lies as the final touch to give it the appearance of a solid theory, which is not of course.

I guess one could think this if he/she hid from the vast amounts of evidence backing such a very well-supported theory.

Now, that is my educated opinion on the subject.

Obviously not very well-educated in the science surrounding evolution. Strange that virtually 100% of biologists, who know the science best, stand in support of the theory, isn't it? The advent of genetic science has put the last nails in the coffin of any doubt surrounding whether or not evolution occurs. Read up on the subject (from real scientific literature) before posting such silly statements.

[js1138]

Now, that is my educated opinion on the subject.

I have to assume you are home-schooled.