[Dimensio]

But I was talking specifically about the theory of evolution, and it's generally accepted (actually it's almost a law) that evolution is made up of speculations, assumptions, unsubstantiated "facts," unobservable "observations, sub/semi-theories all topped with a sprinkle of lies as the final touch to give it the appearance of a solid theory, which is not of course.

And I'm sure that you can explain exactly how this is the case.

Oh, wait, you can't. You just come in here and fire baseless pot-shots at evolution without referencing a single fact. And you ignore any factual information presented to you, dismissing it without even looking at it, because you -- like so many other creationists -- don't care that you have to use lies to support your agenda.

[RunningWolf]

//to give evo the appearance of a solid theory.//

And I'm sure that you can explain exactly how this is the case.

Oh, wait, you can't.

That right demented, you cannot make the case for evo.

For one thing you really never make the case for evo. Just scream 'liar coward' like a street maniac at anyone happens by in the forum and does not drink the evo koolaid.

I don't know what gains for evo you think you are making. If you and your cohorts think these are victories for evo intelligentsia, and academia, then you are sadly mistaken.

Wolf

[Baraonda]

Sorry didn't see your post.

"And I'm sure that you can explain exactly how this is the case."

But I already did in post post #1758

"Oh, wait, you can't."

Uffah! I already did, unless you want me to re-reexplain why evolution is a myth.