Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Oztrich Boy

Wrong agin...but the whole field of EVO is replete with lies and coverups. Amazing.

Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus / A. ajax and B. excelsus / are not different enough to warrant two different genera (but different enough to warrant two different species), and so B. excelsus was lumped into Apatosaurus.

Different as human - me - and ape - you. Don't take it as an insult ;>)


1,337 posted on 12/18/2005 6:32:10 PM PST by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1321 | View Replies ]


To: eleni121
Wrong agin...

Yes you are

Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus / A. ajax and B. excelsus / are not different enough to warrant two different genera (but different enough to warrant two different species), and so B. excelsus was lumped into Apatosaurus.

Your point being?


What that Cretan Paul S. Taylor dosen't realize (or is more likely lying about) it that "brontosaurus" = Apatosaurus. They are one and the same. It's like "buffalo"/bison
1,321 posted on 12/18/2005 6:12:10 PM PST by Oztrich Boy
Because Brontosaurus excelsus is similar to Apatosaurus ajax it is now classed as Apatosaurus excelsus.

Do I have to point ot the analogus realitionship of the "buffalo" Bison bison with Bison bonasus. "Buffalo" are bison. "Brontosaurus" is an apatosaur.

1,373 posted on 12/18/2005 7:02:30 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (so natural to mankind is intolerance in whatever they really care about - J S Mill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1337 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson