Now, if you'll excuse me, I feel the need to take a shower. Thinking about you gives me the creeps and makes me feel very unclean. There is something VERY WRONG with you ... .
Yes. His characterizations do seem to stick.
Some Vicks VapoRub might help with that...
ROFL! He didn't "lie", son, he just posted links to your own posts where you blatantly contradicted yourself (and sounded rather unhinged, frankly).
In the future I will TOTALLY ignore you. You're a VERY sick person.
Yeah, how *dare* he point to your own posts!
Making up lies about me to hide the fact that you are a very viscous liar.
Okay, I'll bite -- where exactly did he "lie" in the following? It seems to be a very accurate description of the contents of your posts (which he conveniently linked so that people could read them for themselves):
And, finally, my personal favourite recent example involves nmh. Earlier this year philosopher Antony Flew announced that he was no longer an atheist. Even still, he said that he did not accept the Judeo-Christian God, and -- the article specifically stated this -- "He accepts Darwinian evolution" (note that the original article is only excerpted on FR, and the link is to a dead page now, but the full article was available for some time, and the original text is archived on multiple places, including here).
Known creationist and liar nmh popped in to say " Those poor atheists. Another one abandons their godless and ridiculous hypothesis of evolution."
Kind of odd given that the article specifically stated that Flew accepts evolution. I corrected his mistake and nmh responded by telling me to " Read the article. He rejects it."
So I re-read the article, see the "He accepts Darwinian evolution" line, and quote the relevant section in my reply. Nmh's response is nothing more than a snide comment wherein he tells me to read the article once more even though absolutely nothing in the article supported his completely false claim.
But the story doesn't end there. Nmh has proven himself a shamless, brazen liar, and I'm not shy about bringing that up when he tries to discuss issues in the future -- after all, he's demonstrated that he's willing to lie to "prove" a point, so why should anything that he says be trusted? So in response to my bringing up of the story of nmh claiming -- falsely -- that Antony Flew rejected evolution, after saying in direct response to an article about Flew that he had "rejected" the "godless and ridiculous hypothesis of evolution", nmh denied ever having heard of Flew and said that he'd never posted anything about the man, even though I could directly link to nmh's posts on the matter.
You'll have to pull someone else's chain for attention.
Nah, it's *so* much fun to watch you go ballistic when your own past self-contradictions are pointed out.
None will be coming from me anymore.
Uh huh. Sure. We believe that.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I feel the need to take a shower.
Be sure to mutter, "Out, damned spot!" while you do.
Thinking about you gives me the creeps and makes me feel very unclean.
Being reminded of your past lies *should* make you feel uneasy.
There is something VERY WRONG with you ... .
What is "VERY WRONG" with documenting your lies?
[Watching creationists go ballistic because they can't admit their errors is *so* much fun.]