[eleni121]

So much fraud to be found in the field of EVO ..where does one begin the herculean task of cleaning out the stench of EVO stables

Start here


http://www.evolutiondeceit.com/chapter9.php#63

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Ota Benga was captured in 1904 by an evolutionist researcher in the Congo."

No, Ota Benga was captured by a missionary (Samuel Phillips Verner) in Africa, NOT by an evolutionist. Deal with it.

"Unable to bear the treatment he was subjected to, Ota Benga eventually committed suicide."

Yes, this is true... except it was AFTER he left the Zoo and was working at a Tobacco factory in Lynchburg, Virginia.

It's amazing the lies that creationists will make to get to heaven.

[Dimensio]

So where is the reference to the "500 thesis"? It's not anywhere on the page to which you linked.

Or were you just lying about that?

I do like how the link refers to Nebraska Man. That's another favourite source of creationist dishonesty, because they can lie about it being a fraud when in fact it was no such thing.

[Dimensio]

Just in case you try to claim that your link did actually provide documentation of the "500 theses" claim, it provides only a reference to The End of Christendom (written in 1980). I had to track down exactly what that work cites, and I found that it simply contains this quote

"I'm very happy to say I live near a place called Piltdown. I like to drive there because it gives me a special glow. You probably know that a skull was discovered there, and no less than five hundred doctoral theses were written on the subject, and then it was discovered that the skull was a practical joke by a worthy dentist in Hastings who'd hurriedly put a few bones together, not even of the same animal, and buried them and stirred up all this business. So I'm not a great man for bones."

Of course, absolutely no reference to any of these "500 theses" is given whatsover, so your claim is still completely unsubstantiated. You've provided nothing more than a link to a citation that merely repeats your claim rather than supports it.

But then your claim was a lie, so I'm not surprised that it has no real support.

[b_sharp]

Your link has only three items, one of which was a fraud perpetrated on scientists, not by scientists, one was an error and one had nothing to do with the science of evolution or scientists.

How does this show that evolutionary scientists are 'bad people'?