Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Creation evangelist derides evolution as ‘dumbest’ theory [Kent Hovind Alert!]
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Post ^ | 17 December 2005 | Kayla Bunge

Posted on 12/17/2005 3:58:48 AM PST by PatrickHenry

A former high school science teacher turned creation science evangelist told an audience at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee last Tuesday that evolution is the “dumbest and most dangerous theory on planet Earth.”

Kent Hovind, founder of Creation Science Evangelism, presented “Creation or Evolution … Which Has More Merit?” to a standing-room only audience in the Union Ballroom on Dec. 6. The event was sponsored by the Apologetics Association, the organization that brought Baptist minister Tim Wilkins to UWM to speak about homosexuality in October.

No debate challengers

Members of the Apologetics Association (AA) contacted biology, chemistry and geology professors at UWM and throughout the UW System, inviting them to debate Hovind for an honorarium of $200 to be provided to the individual or group of individuals who agreed.

Before the event began, the “No-Debater List,” which was comprised of slides listing the names of UWM science professors who declined the invitation, was projected behind the stage.

Dustin Wales, AA president, said it was his “biggest disappointment” that no professor agreed to debate Hovind.

“No professor wanted to defend his side,” he said. “I mean, we had seats reserved for their people … ’cause I know one objection could have been ‘Oh, it’s just a bunch of Christians.’ So we had seats reserved for them to bring people to make sure that it’s somewhat more equal, not just all against one. And still nobody would do it.”

Biology professor Andrew Petto said: “It is a pernicious lie that the Apologetics (Association) is spreading that no one responded to the challenge. Many of us (professors) did respond to the challenge; what we responded was, ‘No, thank you.’ ”

Petto, who has attended three of Hovind’s “performances,” said that because Hovind presents “misinterpretations, half truths and outright lies,” professors at UWM decided not to accept his invitation to a debate.

“In a nutshell, debates like this do not settle issues of scientific understanding,” he said. “Hovind and his arguments are not even in the same galaxy as legitimate scientific discourse. This is why the faculty here has universally decided not to engage Hovind. The result would be to give the appearance of a controversy where none exists.”

He added, “The faculty on campus is under no obligation to waste its time supporting Hovind’s little charade.”


Kent Hovind, a former high school science teacher turned creation science evangelist, said that evolution is the "dumbest and most dangerous theory on planet Earth" at a program in the Union on Dec. 6.

Hovind, however, is used to being turned down. Near the end of his speech, he said, “Over 3,000 professors have refused to debate me. Why? Because I’m not afraid of them.”

No truths in textbooks

Hovind began his multimedia presentation by asserting that evolution is the “dumbest and most dangerous” theory used in the scientific community, but that he is not opposed to science.

“Our ministry is not against science, but against using lies to prove things,” he said. He followed this statement by citing biblical references to lies, which were projected onto screens behind him.

Hovind said: “I am not trying to get evolution out of schools or to get creation in. We are trying to get lies out of textbooks.” He added that if removing “lies” from textbooks leaves no evidence for evolutionists’ theory, then they should “get a new theory.”

He cited numerous state statutes that require that textbooks be accurate and up-to-date, but said these laws are clearly not enforced because the textbooks are filled with lies and are being taught to students.

Petto said it is inevitable that textbooks will contain some errors.

“Sometimes, this is an oversight. Sometimes it is the result of the editorial and revision process. Sometimes it is the result of trying to portray a rich and complex idea in a very few words,” he said.

The first “lie” Hovind presented concerned the formation of the Grand Canyon. He said that two people can look at the canyon. The person who believes in evolution would say, “Wow, look what the Colorado River did for millions and millions of years.” The “Bible-believing Christian” would say, “Wow, look what the flood did in about 30 minutes.”

To elaborate, Hovind discussed the geologic column — the chronologic arrangement of rock from oldest to youngest in which boundaries between different eras are marked by a change in the fossil record. He explained that it does not take millions of years to form layers of sedimentary rock.

“You can get a jar of mud out of your yard, put some water in it, shake it up, set it down, and it will settle out into layers for you,” he said. Hovind used this concept of hydrologic sorting to argue that the biblical flood is what was responsible for the formation of the Grand Canyon’s layers of sedimentary rock.

Hovind also criticized the concept of “micro-evolution,” or evolution on a small, species-level scale. He said that micro-evolution is, in fact, scientific, observable and testable. But, he said, it is also scriptural, as the Bible says, “They bring forth after his kind.”

Therefore, according to the Bible and micro-evolution, dogs produce a variety of dogs and they all have a common ancestor — a dog.

Hovind said, however, Charles Darwin made a “giant leap of faith and logic” from observing micro-evolution into believing in macro-evolution, or evolution above the species level. Hovind said that according to macro-evolution, birds and bananas are related if one goes back far enough in time, and “the ancestor ultimately was a rock.”

He concluded his speech by encouraging students to personally remove the lies from their textbooks and parents to lobby their school board for accurate textbooks.

“Tear that page out of your book,” he said. “Would you leave that in there just to lie to the kids?”

Faith, not science

Petto said Hovind believes the information in textbooks to be “lies” because his determination is grounded in faith, not science.

“Make no mistake, this is not a determination made on the scientific evidence, but one in which he has decided on the basis of faith alone that the Bible is correct, and if the Bible is correct, then science must be wrong,” he said.

Petto said Hovind misinterprets scientific information and then argues against his misinterpretation.

“That is, of course, known as the ‘straw man’ argument — great debating strategy, but nothing to do with what scientists actually say or do,” he said. “The bottom line here is that the science is irrelevant to his conclusions.”

Another criticism of Hovind’s presentation is his citation of pre-college textbooks. Following the event, an audience member said, “I don’t think using examples of grade school and high school biology can stand up to evolution.”

Petto called this an “interesting and effective rhetorical strategy” and explained that Hovind is not arguing against science, but the “textbook version” of science.

“The texts are not presenting the research results of the scientific community per se, but digesting and paraphrasing it in a way to make it more effective in learning science,” he said. “So, what (Hovind) is complaining about is not what science says, but what the textbooks say that science says.”

Petto said this abbreviated version of scientific research is due, in part, to the editorial and production processes, which impose specific limits on what is included.

He added that grade school and high school textbooks tend to contain very general information about evolution and pressure from anti-evolutionists has weakened evolutionary discussion in textbooks.

“Lower-level texts … tend to be more general in their discussions of evolution and speak more vaguely of ‘change over time’ and adaptation and so on,” he said. “Due to pressure by anti-evolutionists, textbook publishers tend to shy away from being ‘too evolutionary’ in their texts … The more pressure there is on schools and publishers, the weaker the evolution gets, and the weaker it gets, the more likely that it will not do a good job of representing the current consensus among biologists.”

Debate offer still stands

Hovind has a “standing offer” of $250,000 for “anyone who can give any empirical evidence (scientific proof) for evolution.” According to Hovind’s Web site, the offer “demonstrates that the hypothesis of evolution is nothing more than a religious belief.”

The Web site, www.drdino.com, says, “Persons wishing to collect the $250,000 may submit their evidence in writing or schedule time for a public presentation. A committee of trained scientists will provide peer review of the evidence offered and, to the best of their ability, will be fair and honest in their evaluation and judgment as to the validity of the evidence presented.”

Make it visible

Wales said the AA’s goal in bringing Hovind to UWM was “to crack the issue on campus” and bring attention to the fallibility of evolution.

“The ultimate goal was to say that, ‘Gosh, evolution isn’t as concrete as you say it is, and why do you get to teach everyone this non-concrete thing and then not defend it when someone comes and says your wrong?’ ” he said. “It’s just absurd.”


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: antisciencetaliban; clowntown; creatidiot; creationisminadress; crevolist; cultureofidiocy; darwindumb; evolution; fearofcreation; fearofgod; goddooditamen; hidebehindscience; hovind; idiocy; idsuperstition; ignoranceisstrength; keywordwars; lyingforthelord; monkeyman; monkeyscience; scienceeducation; silencingdebate; uneducatedsimpletons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,921-1,9401,941-1,9601,961-1,980 ... 2,121-2,129 next last
To: MHalblaub
Blessed are the poor in spirit:

for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

I've always believed the Beatitudes to be the most beautiful of Christ's teachings.

1,941 posted on 12/20/2005 12:38:37 PM PST by Quark2005 (Divination is NOT science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1884 | View Replies]

To: Full Court

Is that a joke or something?


1,942 posted on 12/20/2005 12:38:58 PM PST by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1940 | View Replies]

To: Junior

I thought that "the fall" was the catch-all excuse for any features of the human body that seem less than optimal?


1,943 posted on 12/20/2005 12:40:44 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1868 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
For instance you and your sister (or a cousin, or an uncle) "share common ancestry". This does not mean that your originated FROM your sister (or cousin, or uncle).

I've been wondering if maybe he's from Arkansas.

(With apologies to any rational people living in Arkansas)
1,944 posted on 12/20/2005 12:47:35 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1926 | View Replies]

To: Full Court
"unless you are a Muslim or Atheist or some other Christ hating type person.

Come now, didn't anyone ever tell you about making sweeping generalizations like that?

I'm an atheist. I don't hate Christ. I don't believe he existed, (that's just my opinion) but I don't hate him.

1,945 posted on 12/20/2005 2:03:56 PM PST by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1940 | View Replies]

To: Invincibly Ignorant
Ah Chuck, even most Messianics I know believe Josephus quotes about Jesus are dubious.

Steven:

The veracity of Josephus is of little concern to those who are lost.

They are in the flesh and think they are right.

I can not change the mind of an unbeliever.

All I can do is preach the Holy Word of G-d.

b'shem Y'shua

1,946 posted on 12/20/2005 2:47:36 PM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Y'shua <==> YHvH is my Salvation (Psalm 118-14))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1715 | View Replies]

To: Stultis; Dimensio; Baraonda
I am not saying that they are equivalent claims. Dimensio has made no assertive answer to men from monkeys or not, only that she/he did not say it,

But Dimensio does make this claim

//Humans and monkeys share common ancestry.//

So what is the common ancestry? Thats all nothing else. Just the facts.., MAM.

Real and specific facts please.

Wolf
1,947 posted on 12/20/2005 3:54:10 PM PST by RunningWolf (Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1933 | View Replies]

To: RunningWolf

"But Dimensio does make this claim

"//Humans and monkeys share common ancestry.//"

Humans are not descendant from monkeys. Dimensio knows it. He's just being disingenuous, to use a euphemism.

Evolution is all speculation and zero speciation.


1,948 posted on 12/20/2005 4:09:13 PM PST by Baraonda (Demographic is destiny. Don't hire 3rd world illegal aliens nor support businesses that hire them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1947 | View Replies]

To: Baraonda
//Humans and monkeys share common ancestry.//

Thats the core of all evo and they bring no facts for it.

The theory itself then becomes a tool of secular liberals to undermine the bedrock of our nation.

Maybe thats why they go ballistic when the finally are faced with one one their assertions

The only examples I have ever seen of people screaming liar fraud bla bla this much would be the movie footage of Nazi judges at the peoples tribunal's, or someone being drug off into the institution.

Wolf
1,949 posted on 12/20/2005 4:25:57 PM PST by RunningWolf (Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1948 | View Replies]

To: RunningWolf

"Evolution is all speculation and zero speciation."

How do you like my new line?

Maybe I should use it as my tagline?

I'll wait until I get a response to it from the Darwin worshippers before I use it as my tagline. Their response to it will determine whether I'll adopt it or not.

I like consensus.


1,950 posted on 12/20/2005 4:35:18 PM PST by Baraonda (Demographic is destiny. Don't hire 3rd world illegal aliens nor support businesses that hire them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1949 | View Replies]

To: Baraonda
Neat tagline lol

Yes you must kneel at Darwin Central, or even worse convince them you have swallowed the koolaid.

Wolf
1,951 posted on 12/20/2005 4:41:12 PM PST by RunningWolf (Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1950 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt
The veracity of Josephus is of little concern to those who are lost.

They why post them?

1,952 posted on 12/20/2005 5:03:34 PM PST by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1946 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
"I'd rather be a pig than a Creationist"

That's okay, Oztrich Boy, because you obviously have your head in the sand.

One day it will be Mexican sand, because you and your kind insist on carrying out a war upon believers in this country, with the predictable result.

Brush up on your Espanol, Amigo.

1,953 posted on 12/20/2005 5:39:10 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse (unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1491 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
Just as Christians overcame the mightiest empire in the world, Rome, just as our Jewish brothers survive against what would normally insurmountable odds; just as Christian patriots threw off the yoke of the oppressive British empire; just as Christian abolitionists led the charge against slavery, we will overcome you as well.

You can call it "White Horse's Theory of Revolution".

1,954 posted on 12/20/2005 5:46:48 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse (unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1491 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

So Oztrich Boy, you and your secular humanist pals who have contributed nothing to our great country, or the world in general, except misery, will find yourselves losing what you would call 'survival of the fittest'.


1,955 posted on 12/20/2005 5:55:26 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse (unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1491 | View Replies]

To: b_sharp
There is a difference between a scientific theory and a scientific law, but not the one you are hoping for.

There is a difference between Americans and Canadians, one I am very glad for, but not much difference between Canadians and the French, one that is quite expected.

1,956 posted on 12/20/2005 6:14:50 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse (unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1898 | View Replies]

To: Baraonda; RunningWolf; Dimensio
"//Humans and monkeys share common ancestry.//"

Humans are not descendant from monkeys. Dimensio knows it. He's just being disingenuous, to use a euphemism.

Yes, Dimensio knows it. No, Dimensio is not being "disingenuous". You are. Or maybe you're just invincibly stupid. Dimensio repeatedly (and correctly) said that humans are not descended from monkeys, and ALSO (and correctly) that humans and monkeys share common ancestry.

Even RunningWolf understands that these are not equivalent statements. (See #1947) You're the last holdout in claiming that is "disingenuous" to say "share common ancestry with" because it implies "descended from".

I tried to explain this to you in a childishly simple way: that you share common ancestry with your sister, but this doesn't mean you descended from your sister. Is there something about your familial circumstances that makes this example confusing to you?

1,957 posted on 12/20/2005 6:26:45 PM PST by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1948 | View Replies]

To: Baraonda
"Evolution is all speculation and zero speciation."

How do you like my new line?

Maybe I should use it as my tagline?

I'll wait until I get a response to it from the Darwin worshippers before I use it as my tagline. Their response to it will determine whether I'll adopt it or not.

Well, since you ask... I vote for the new tagline. A good, old fashioned creationist lie is preferable to isolationist paleocon racism any day.

PREMPTION: Why do I suggest racism? Let's look:

Demographic is destiny. Don't hire 3rd world illegal aliens nor support businesses that hire them.

Why "3rd world" illegals, and not just illegals? Why "demographic," especially in connection with "3rd world"?

For instance one of the most positive demographics is found among Pakistani immigrants. They are equivalent to Indians in having the highest education level among all immigrant groups, in spite of the fact that Pakistan is even more "3rd world" then Mexico, and are the most rapid in providing net benefit, moving up the economic scale and providing tax revenues in excess of public services consumed.

I'll admit I could be wrong, but I get the impression you're more concerned with the COLOR of immigrants than their objective demographics OR their legal status.

1,958 posted on 12/20/2005 6:37:19 PM PST by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1950 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq

That should be the least of your worries.

1,959 posted on 12/20/2005 6:43:24 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse (unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1958 | View Replies]

To: Stultis; Baraonda
Look get off it will you.

The difference in those two statements is nothing, semantics really .

When its man and ape, descended, evolved, ancestry,.. look we all know what you are evos are saying no matter how cleverly you believe you have hidden it.

That last paragraph.. You make a complete ass of yourself

Wolf
1,960 posted on 12/20/2005 6:46:50 PM PST by RunningWolf (Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1957 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,921-1,9401,941-1,9601,961-1,980 ... 2,121-2,129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson