Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: ml/nj

Ovulation versus cretinism

Two different theories exist concerning the origin of children: the theory of sexual reproduction, and the theory of the stork. Many people believe in the theory of sexual reproduction because they have been taught this theory at school.

In reality, however, many of the world's leading scientists are in favour of the theory of the stork. If the theory of sexual reproduction is taught in schools, it must only be taught as a theory and not as the truth. Alternative theories, such as the theory of the
stork, must also be taught.

Evidence supporting the theory of the stork includes the following:

1. It is a scientifically established fact that the stork does exist.
This can be confirmed by every ornithologist.

2. The alledged human foetal development contains several features that the theory of sexual reproduction is unable to explain.

3. The theory of sexual reproduction implies that a child is approximately nine months old at birth. This is an absurd claim. Everyone knows that a newborn child is newborn.

4. According to the theory of sexual reproduction, children are a result of sexual intercourse. There are, however, several well documented cases where sexual intercourse has not led to the birth of a child.

5. Statistical studies in the Netherlands have indicated a positive correlation between the birth rate and the number of storks. Both are decreasing.

6. The theory of the stork can be investigated by rigorous scientific methods.
The only assumption involved is that children are delivered by the stork.

http://www.antievolution.org/features/evohumor/storkism.html


298 posted on 12/15/2005 7:37:08 PM PST by thomaswest (Just Curious)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies ]


To: thomaswest
Two different theories exist concerning the origin of children: the theory of sexual reproduction, and the theory of the stork.

I assume you think this is brilliant.

But when you're done laughing, just think a bit on "evolving" the mechanisms required for live birth. The baby (now nine months old BTW) has been living on one system which handles food, oxygen, and waste; and then suddenly switches to a completely different system without opportunity to revert. I wonder how many small changes there were and how many babies died while "evolution" was trying to get this right. If it took a whole generation, we would have been dead.

ML/NJ

324 posted on 12/16/2005 4:20:25 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson