"My point in all this debate, is that Darwin's theory is just that, a theory."
And that puts in the same company as every other theory in science. You say *just a theory* as if there is something higher for it to become.
"If one theory is to be presented, then other valid options should as well be presented."
Only if they are scientific theories. ID doesn't cut it.
"Also, I was not the first one to shift the burden of proof, read my first post, I asked for proof, and still have been presented with none,..."
You will find proof for NO theories in science. Proof is for mathematics and whiskey.
I agree that is why there called theories, my point is that they should present both sides to a debate, if only one side is allowed to be presented, then it is not truly presented as a theory.