Posted on 11/29/2005 9:31:13 AM PST by Sub-Driver
Kansas Prof. Apologizes for E-Mail
11 minutes ago
A University of Kansas religion professor apologized for an e-mail that referred to religious conservatives as "fundies" and said a course describing intelligent design as mythology would be a "nice slap in their big fat face."
In a written apology Monday, Paul Mirecki, chairman of the university's Religious Studies Department, said he would teach the planned class "as a serious academic subject and in an manner that respects all points of view."
The department faculty approved the course Monday but changed its title. The course, originally called "Special Topics in Religion: Intelligent Design, Creationisms and other Religious Mythologies," will instead be called "Intelligent Design and Creationism."
The class was added to next spring's curriculum after the Kansas State Board of Education decided to include more criticism of evolution in its standards for science teaching. The vote was seen as a big win for proponents of intelligent design, who argue that the universe is so complex that it must have been created by a higher power.
Critics say intelligent design is merely creationism a literal reading of the Bible's story of creation camouflaged in scientific language.
Mirecki's e-mail was sent Nov. 19 to members of the Society of Open-Minded Atheists and Agnostics, a student organization for which he serves as faculty adviser.
"The fundies (fundamentalists) want it all taught in a science class, but this will be a nice slap in their big fat face by teaching it as a religious studies class under the category mythology."
Mirecki addressed the message to "my fellow damned" and signed off with: "Doing my part to (tick) off the religious right, Evil Dr. P."
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
Indeed.
Ok, I'll just think it :)
Yawn! Teachers and students alike around here wear crosses and other Christian symbols without a word of comment. You really are clueless.
I'm sure I can figure out my own point, thanks. Perhaps you can educate editor-surveyor on the likelihood of the falsity of his claim that Barrett's license was revoked.
Why don't you track Barrett down in his court adventures, and see what kind of man he is? (not likely,huh?)
The intent of the Darwin Fish is to make Christians the object of derision.
Why would Christians who think Darwin and the ToE are compatible think this is the purpose of the symbol?
I don't think it is very Christian to be so hypersensitive. What would Jesus say?
Yes RWP, you are a truly noble, open-minded man!
I'm sure you meant to direct that comment to AC - he doesn't seem to believe your claim that Barrett had his license revoked, but I'll let you two hash it all out. Cheers!
I'm sure you can too, but Barrett still failed a board certification and lost the case. You will also find in the link I gave, the statement that he had sued 40 other times. He "sounds" like the Wendy's chili finger lady.
Sorry for the confusion.
He makes the Wendy's chilli finger lady look like a paragon of virtue. He has dedicated his life to preventing people from avoiding, or being cured of disease.
It seems as if you might be technically wrong on the actual circumstances surrounding the infamous doctor. However, if you change the description to "the self-admitted uncertified due to exam failure and who also lost a libel suit while suing 40 others" doctor Barrett, you might please the advocates of the "fine" doctor.
The joke is, like most Christian symbols, the fish was co-opted from an earlier pagan fish symbol, which denoted the vagina of the mother goddess. It's theirs only by theft. And it's a little rude. :-)
Somehow, I think you're saying that for purely partisan reasons. Actually, Quackwatch is a quality site that I have personally visited for years. A member of my family is an "alternativist" who constantly pushes the latest fads in nutritional supplements and herbs (the latest being ganoderma). I've relied on Quackwatch to debunk all the questionable practices thrown at me.
Sorry, my Bible doesn't have "2Chron 16: 22-end of ch."
Where does it say he lost his license?
I understand your need to salvage something here :)
Fossil: KNM-ER 3733
Site: Koobi Fora (Upper KBS tuff, area 104), Lake Turkana, Kenya (4, 1)
Discovered By: B. Ngeneo, 1975 (1)
Estimated Age of Fossil: 1.75 mya * determined by Stratigraphic, faunal, paleomagnetic & radiometric data (1, 4)
Species Name: Homo ergaster (1, 7, 8), Homo erectus (3, 4, 7), Homo erectus ergaster (25)
Gender: Female (species presumed to be sexually dimorphic) (1, 8)
Cranial Capacity: 850 cc (1, 3, 4)
Information: Tools found in same layer (8, 9). Found with KNM-ER 406- A. boisei (effectively eliminating single species hypothesis) (1)
Interpretation: Adult (based on cranial sutures, molar eruption and dental wear) (1)
See original source for notes:
Source: http://www.mos.org/evolution/fossils/fossilview.php?fid=33
What does any of this have to do with involuntarily losing one's license. Board certification is a nice credential and is required to practice an many hospitals, but lacking it has nothing to do with having a medical license, and it has nothing to do with losing a lawsuit.
Are you defending medical quackery, or jus jumping in to be obnoxious?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.