To: Leapfrog
I disagree. Your OS is not in my server room because it is unreliable.
Or, alternatively, you're an ABMer zealot ... This goes directly to the heart of our "vulnerabilities" argument.
Your deployment choice doesn't constitute proof. Try dealing with the issue of vulnerabilities. You know: fact-based reality...
15 posted on
11/07/2005 6:31:44 PM PST by
Bush2000
(Linux -- You Get What You Pay For ... (tm)
To: Bush2000
ABMer zealot I'm a career Unix Admin, so I'm probably guilty on the ABM thing. However, that opinion is based upon observation.
As to your tagline: Whatever. Linux/BSD/FreeBSD/whatever.
Yes, they are better than the current Microsoft products.
However, they are nowhere near to matching real commercial Unixes.
17 posted on
11/07/2005 6:45:09 PM PST by
Michael Goldsberry
(an enemy of islam -- Joe Boucher; Leapfrog; Dr.Zoidberg; Lazamataz; ...)
To: Bush2000
Or, alternatively, you're an ABMer zealot You'll excuse me but the person between the two of you who spends more time and effort to attack an operating system is not Leapfrog so your attempts to smear him as a zealot seem misplaced and somewhat ironic.
29 posted on
11/08/2005 4:55:06 AM PST by
N3WBI3
(If SCO wants to go fishing they should buy a permit and find a lake like the rest of us..)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson