Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro

Nothing cryptic about this; old traditionalist views of the Constitution (e.g. Thomas, possibly Scalia, possibly Alito) wouldn't see anything unconstitutional about this middle approach at all. After that, getting the consensus back on the court all politics. Seems your conservatism hits a hard limit mid 20th century and you might choose to vote Democrat for president rather than risk the, er, "clock be turned back."


493 posted on 11/07/2005 7:02:17 PM PST by The Red Zone (Florida, the sun-shame state, and Illinois the chicken injun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies ]


To: The Red Zone
Nothing cryptic about this; old traditionalist views of the Constitution (e.g. Thomas, possibly Scalia, possibly Alito) wouldn't see anything unconstitutional about this middle approach at all.

Scalia, probably. Thomas, maybe. Two. I don't know another creationist sympathizer on the court.

One problem in Dover was the science teachers didn't like ID one bit.

499 posted on 11/07/2005 7:10:29 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson