If you say so.
Nor have you refuted a lot of my questions.
List them and I'll be glad to address them.
The shotgun cut and paste approach does not work well with new ideas, but it is useful only to bury them.
If you can't refute the material, just admit it. Until you do, the fact remains that I've thoroughly refuted the claptrap that was listed from that deeply dishonest creationist book.
Evolution is not cut and dried science,
Nothing ever is.
and more and more these days the foundation stones are being removed and replaced with much more advanced science.
ROFL!!! Okay, sure, right. Such as?
It is bringing big questions on the assumptions of Darwin and his followers.
Such as?
Radio-Metric dating is hardly the panacea to silence the curious anymore.
It's not intended to "silence" anyone, it just provides accurate dates for countless archaeological samples. If that bothers, you, well, that's your problem.
But as it falls, and falling it is, it is taking the roof off of a lot of people locked in the dark.
Do you get dizzy when you spin that much?
Try using the scroll button. You are obviously being obtuse intentionally. I have stated my position at least three times, somehow I do not think stating it again will reach your see no evil, hear no evil approach to science.