No, they aren't. Trying to discredit an author in order to dishonestly imply that his material is faulty is a fallacy.
It is not, however, a fallacy to show that because the material is laughably wrong, the author is being ridiculous.
I did the latter, not the former. Try to keep up.
But, since you are so bereft of logic,
Unsupported assertion, ten yard penalty. It also appears to be a cheap tactic used for the purpose of evasion (i.e., the old "I don't have to respond to the points you've made if I pretend they aren't there" ruse.)
go sod yourself off thinking you are so smart...
Wow, how could I possibly continue in the face of such a calm, witty, informative, rational response from you?
Look, if you're not emotionally and/or logically able to deal with people pointing out your mistakes, go find some other thread to pester.
I discovered the thread before you. You run along old man...