Replies

No, actually if you apply science to the Bible you come out very well indeed. It has been a fascinating study for me. For instance, for a long time I heard the statement that the earth had waters above, and waters below and that when the Noah thing happened it rained for 40 days and the earth was flooded. Now that totally tweaked me for a while till I understood that water, when super cooled is a super conductor. Know what a super conductor does when it is put in a magnetic field? It is suspended. So if the earth had rings of ice, it would have been a stable condition.

It also would have drastically reduced the radiation from the sun and space, throwing off radio carbon dating world wide!

A near miss by an asteroid, or even a capture event could have unbalanced the entire structure and caused the ice rings to tumble into the gravity center. But this is the kicker, the ice would have come in at the poles, if it was super cooled, not the equator. Ice thickness tests of the polar caps show that the ice thickness is centered around the Magnetic Poles not the true poles. This clearly indicates that the Ice caps are not a weather phenomena, but a space borne phenomena! In other words, the Ice Age may be a one time event, and global warming is caused by Ice melting. Gasp, the world gets warmer when Ice melts, go figure.

Not politically correct science, but science none the less. And FUN! I love science.

But where did Noah put the fresh water fish when the seas inundated the fresh water lakes and streams? Or the ants, which would have been flooded out. Or the the hundreds of thousands of species of beetles? How did he make the carnivores not eat the herbivores? How can all of humanity be the product of 8 people (the flood survivors) without a tremendous genetic bottleneck having occurred? And so on...

The Flood is a story for little children.

No, actually if you apply science to the Bible you come out very well indeed. It has been a fascinating study for me. For instance, for a long time I heard the statement that the earth had waters above, and waters below and that when the Noah thing happened it rained for 40 days and the earth was flooded. Now that totally tweaked me for a while till I understood that water, when super cooled is a super conductor. Know what a super conductor does when it is put in a magnetic field? It is suspended. So if the earth had rings of ice, it would have been a stable condition. It also would have drastically reduced the radiation from the sun and space, throwing off radio carbon dating world wide!

I rewrote this a couple of times trying not to sound mean. And I promise you I don't intend to be mean. But that is perhaps the most ignorant post about science I have ever seen.

It shows such a basic lack of even high school level science that it really means you are not yet qualified to speak about this.

A super conductor has no resistances to electricity. They don't occur in nature at room temperature. Water is not a super conductor. No amount of electricity or sunlight would change the nuclear makeup to effect radio dating.

My response to what you posted is about the same as if someone told me they read the bible and found out that Jesus wants us to kill everyone and eat them -it is so absurd that if I didn't already know you from your posting and know you to be sincere I would think you were simply trolling.

If reconciling the bible with science is at all important to you I urge you most strongly to get some basic science textbooks and learn the basics. I'll either answer any questions you have or refer you to someone who knows more than I if I can't answer.

But honest to goodness, your post is a poster child for the problem at hand. And I give you my word I don't say this to be mean.

This is a classic here. Best example of Creationist Science I have ever seen.