Posted on 10/03/2005 6:22:51 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
After a weekend break from a court case involving intelligent design, the Dover school board officials will face business as usual. The board today will hold its first school board meeting since the trial began.
On Sunday, Dover school board member David Napierski said he sympathized with the time fellow members Shelia Harkins and Alan Bonsell have spent on the court case.
“I really haven’t seen it erode them from their duties,” he said. “It definitely has taken a lot of their time . . . I think it is sapping some of the people, too.”
The trial began Sept. 26 in U.S. Middle District Court in Harrisburg. It resumes Wednesday.
Napierski hopes to attend at least one day per week of the trial.
“We’re seeing one side of the whole picture right now,” he said. “I think it’s going to go all the way up to the Supreme Court.”
He said dealing with the court case while running the school district is a “double-edged sword.
“I just hope and pray that our focus will stay on business,” he said.
School district residents might have a difficult time resuming day-to-day life as it was before the trial began.
Lonnie Langioni left his position as a school board member in Dover in 2003. He said the issue has divided the community and he wants folks to again be friends.
“We’re just going to have to let it run its course,” he said about the trial. “I’m just waiting for the day that this is all over and that the people of Dover can go back to talking to each other again.”
He said he follows the case and reads newspapers and articles online.
“It’s crossed all kinds of lines,” he said of the trial. “Dover is a great community. We all need to respect each others’ viewpoints.”
Former Dover school board member Barrie Callahan, a plaintiff in the court case, is ready to spend more time in court this week.
“The case needs to proceed,” she said Saturday. “I know the issue. To see it through the process is truly fascinating.
“You’re seeing the best of the best,” she said about attorneys. “It is an honor to be in their presence.”
She said she’s been following news of the trial posted online.
“It’s not about little tiny Dover,” she said. “This case really, really is important.”
UPDATE
Trial schedule: The trial resumes Wednesday and Thursday in U.S. Middle District Court in Harrisburg and is scheduled to continue Oct. 12, 14, 17 through 21, 24, 27 and Nov. 2 through 4.
At stake: It’s the most significant court challenge to evolution since 1987, and it’s the first time a court has been asked to rule whether intelligent design can be taught in public schools. Experts say the case’s outcome could influence how science is defined and taught in schools across the country. The lead defense lawyer said he wanted to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Coming this week: Among the scheduled witnesses: Dover school district science teacher Bertha Spahr and Jennifer Miller and plaintiffs Cynthia Sneath, Joel Leib and Deb Fenimore.
Barbara Forrest, a professor of philosophy at Southeastern Louisiana University, also is scheduled. Forrest co-authored “Creationism’s Trojan Horse,” subtitled “The Wedge of Intelligent Design.”
Does creationist theory say you can lie your way into heaven?
No that would be intelligent design. It took intelligence to throw the frog in the blender, and intelligence to press the blender switch. So funnily enough you have just disproved Intelligent Design, not evolution.
If a chevy camaro and a pontiac firebird both had an identical set of scratches on the paint work I would suspect they had originated from the same source.
BS - No that would be intelligent design. It took intelligence to throw the frog in the blender, and intelligence to press the blender switch. So funnily enough you have just disproved Intelligent Design, not evolution.
I have friends in France who would take you to task on your assertion.
Any bets as to how many of them last the week....????
LOL!
Careful, your multiple personality disorder is showing.
Apparently it is, in the high-school slang sense.
Double standards all around.
I think the FSM is pretty funny myself. Don't you guys have a sense of humor?
And where, pray tell, in the Bible does it say you can have a sense of humor?
please define for me:
Massive
Anti-science
Troll
ping and list are gimmies...
I was pinged by him on that list.
But by all means, if you claim there is one show us all. I'm sure every museum in the world would be interested in acquiring it for even ONE species.
Darwin also said everything sprouted forth from spontanious generation. Everything, plant and animal, has one common ancestor, a supposed single cell that created itself. He said " original life probably arose from a "little pond" where sunlight was acting on organic salts". Modern evolutionists, proclaim that "ultraviolet light acting on a primitive atmosphere of water, ammonia & methane produced a "hot dilute soup" of basic life".
If you find that funny, so do I. It's magic! The people claim ID relies on magic, I claim so does TOE. At least ID is more believable. Modern biology proves ID. Nobody put me up to anything. My posts reflect both what evolutionists say and creationists say. Perhaps TOE people should read up on what TOE is, before they claim "it doesn't say that". TOE is Cosmic Evolution, Stellar Evolution, Chemical Evolution, Planetary Evolution, Organic Evolution, Macro Evolution and finally Micro Evolution. each step in the TOE requires magic. If you find it humorous, good. So do I. TOE people make such fools of themselves.
False
I'm sure every museum in the world would be interested in acquiring it
Every natural science museum already has plenty off them. Quit making such a fool of yourself and stop by to check them out sometimes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.