This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 07/15/2005 10:48:07 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Locked. |
Posted on 07/15/2005 9:34:12 AM PDT by underwiredsupport
Exclusive: US Representative Tom Tancredo in Response to U.S. Nuke Threat: We Could Nuke Mecca 15 July 2005: He is a no-nonsense House Representative from Colorado, a staunch critic of the federal government's lax immigration and border enforcement policies, and one who recognizes the clear and present threat posed by Islamic terrorists inside the United States. In an exclusive interview today with Pat Campbell, host of AM 540 WFLA said yesterday he would request a briefing from the Justice Department on information it has on plans revealed by WND this week for a nuclear attack on the U.S. by al-Qaeda. Responding to a question by Mr. Campbell about our possible response to such a threat, Representative Tancredo said that there are things that could be done to pre-empt a threat, and in response to an attack as well. One response would be to take out one of their holy cities with a nuclear bomb if it was clearly proven Islamic terrorists were behind such an attack. Through the courtesy of AM 540 WFLA and Mr. Patrick Campbell, the Northeast Intelligence Network is offering the audio excerpt from this interview. Click on the link below to download the MP3 audio and listen from your computer. The Northeast Intelligence Network applauds Representative Tancredo for all of his anti-terrorism efforts to keep our country safe. We also applaud Mr. Campbell for asking the tough but necessary questions - AND getting the answers.
Here is the quote from Tancredo! "What if you said, if something like this happened in the United States, (and it was the result of extremist Muslims) then we could take out their Holy Sites!"
To validate, listen here:
I say lets do a pre-empt and do it now!
I hope we can too. I just don't know if anything else can work anymore...these nutcases don't think like we do.
Nor should they.
I can say it here, but if he said it, it was probably not a good idea to have done that.....
"Perhaps Karl Rove was trying to replace a mental patient with a conservative."
Hahah...I guess if you consider someone who wants the borders shut down a "mental patient", you can lump me into that crowd.
Does "conservatism" involve open borders? LOL If so, count me out
Who need nukes when we've got him? Imagine what would happen if we dropped Congressman Tancredo on Mecca. From 40,000 feet without a parachute.
Perhaps it's time we replaced Karl Rove with a person who isn't trying to erase the borders of America.
Do you really think Al Qaeda cares about a responding attack? We don't need to be giving them propaganda and justification to launch a "pre-emptory" strike on the U.S.
Why? If they set off so much as a dirty bomb in our country, Mecca should be fair game. We know the source of the hatred, and it comes from the mosques. Who do the imams answer to? Mecca.
These Tancredo threads certainly show who the "moderates" are. They're the ones who immediately adopt the liberal tactic of name calling.
I guess the only moderate response would be to try and understand the muslims.
It's a deterrant. We have to do it.
I totally agree.
That's NOT how we won WWII. And likely why we are losing too many of OUR soldiers now; pussy-footing around terrorist filled mosques, cities, countries...
hillary gives many thanks for your and tancredo's kneejerkedness.
Well, If terrorists Nuked New York, Chicago, And LA what would you do? I'd say Nuke Mecca, Medina, and another....
Please keep in mind that I believe that Bush said "All" options are on the table if they use WMD, and he even said again he would not limit our military in it's options to protect our troops and country.
Truman didn't.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.