[Texasforever]

"Do as I say or else!" And I do not agree with Ms. Ingram and her ugly name calling of the president. The disrespect in calling him "Mr. Peepers" is an afront to all decency.

I don't believe for a New York minute that she called him "Mr. Peepers". The guy that posted this put his words in her mouth and is too gutless to even respond to his own thread.

[MikeA]

I hope you're right. My apologies to Laura and all if she didn't say that. She has every right to disagree of course. But to be disagreeable is just not called for.

[Captainpaintball]

I'm going to bed. So I will not be around for any replies. That makes the following questions rhetorical: I "axe" these questions in all honesty: 1.)Is the President incapable of making a mistake? 2.)Is he perfect in every way? 3.)Can anyone think of one area of intense disagreement they have with the President? 4.)Is he a.)one or b.)two steps below the Son of God? 5.)Why is anyone that is not happy with the President's job performance a troll, plant, DUmbass, etc? 6.) Can you tell the differnce between a hate-filled, mentally diseased Liberal and a Conservative that is not happy with the Administration for entirely different reasons? 7.)Is it against the rules to be angry with the Administration and voice his/her opinion on this forum? Or is it just impossible to do so without the hysterical accusations?

Don't reply to me. This is a private introspective mental exercise for those of you who need it. Apparently there are a few of you out there. If I find any replies to this post in the morning, I will respond to you on this thread and in Freepmail with the word "douche", so you've been warned. Just think about what I asked.